Social media platform Reddit has initiated a legal challenge against Australia’s recent ban prohibiting individuals under the age of 16 from having their own accounts on major social media platforms. The legislation, which took effect on December 6, 2024, affects platforms including Reddit, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, Facebook, and YouTube.
In a filing to the High Court, Reddit contended that the ban infringes on users’ rights to free political speech and raises privacy concerns. The company emphasized its commitment to youth safety online but argued that the court action was not intended to evade compliance with the law. In a post on its platform, Reddit stated, “We believe there are more effective ways for the Australian government to accomplish our shared goal of protecting youth.”
Concerns Over Implementation and Impact
Reddit expressed concerns that the new law would force intrusive verification processes on both minors and adults, potentially compromising privacy. It further argued that the ban would isolate teenagers from engaging in age-appropriate community experiences. “This creates an illogical patchwork of which platforms are included and which aren’t,” the company remarked.
The platform highlighted that it is predominantly used by adults, noting that it does not market or target advertising to users under the age of 18. Prior to the law, Reddit had an age rating of 17+ in the Apple App Store.
Australia’s Health Minister Mark Butler criticized Reddit’s challenge, suggesting that the company prioritizes profit over the safety of young users. “When our governments take strong action to protect citizens against highly addictive, highly damaging products, they are often challenged in the courts by the companies that profit from them,” he stated. “The idea that this action by Reddit is to protect the political freedoms of young people is a complete crock.”
Global Implications and Future Actions
Butler asserted that the Australian government would vigorously defend the law against Reddit’s challenge, drawing parallels to historical legal battles faced by the tobacco industry. He noted that the world is observing Australia as it implements this pioneering regulation, which aims to mitigate risks such as cyberbullying and exposure to distressing content. “If this is successful, I am confident other countries will follow suit,” Butler added.
The regulation, which received support from nearly all major political parties in parliament, mandates that affected companies introduce age verification measures within a year. Non-compliance could result in substantial fines of up to $49.5 million AUD (approximately $33 million USD).
Interestingly, reports have emerged that numerous teenagers still have active accounts despite the law coming into force, with some managing to circumvent the regulations on the very first day.
As the legal proceedings unfold, it remains to be seen how this landmark case will shape the future of social media regulations in Australia and beyond.
