UPDATE: In a stunning speech delivered at the Federalist Society’s annual lawyers’ conference on October 25, 2023, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche launched a fiery defense of the Justice Department, declaring a “war” against accusations of political weaponization. His remarks come amid a backdrop of high-profile indictments affecting Trump’s political rivals, notably former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, both of whom have pleaded not guilty to their charges.
Blanche’s speech was marked by provocative rhetoric, as he referred to the previous administration’s Justice Department as “bats—t crazy,” igniting laughter from the conservative audience. He vehemently dismissed claims of political prosecution, stating, “When I read now that we’re weaponizing, I feel like I’m being gaslit.” His tone was combative, emphasizing that the Justice Department’s actions serve to uphold justice rather than politicize it.
The deputy attorney general did not hold back in his criticism of judges, asserting, “They have a robe on but they are more political or certainly as political as the most liberal governor or [district attorney].” He pointed to a group of judges he labeled as “repeat players,” stating, “that’s obviously not by happenstance, that’s intentional, and it’s a war, man.”
Furthermore, Blanche targeted the D.C. Bar, describing it as “one of the most activist, obnoxious bars when it comes to going after conservative lawyers.” This criticism highlights tensions within the legal community, as Blanche suggested that conservative voices have been unfairly targeted.
Throughout his remarks, Blanche maintained that the Justice Department is engaged in a critical fight against what he perceives as politically motivated resistance. His defense of the department comes during a turbulent time in American politics, where legal challenges against political figures have become increasingly common.
As the speech unfolded, Blanche also addressed media coverage, claiming that journalists unfairly criticize the administration’s immigration policies while ignoring comparable statements made by Democratic politicians. His comments reflect a broader frustration within the administration about perceived bias in media reporting.
The implications of Blanche’s address are significant, as it underscores a deepening divide between the Justice Department and its critics. His framing of legal challenges as a “war” may resonate with supporters of the former president, amplifying the rhetoric surrounding the ongoing political landscape.
As this story develops, observers will be watching closely for any further reactions from the legal community and political figures. Stay tuned for updates on this urgent issue as the legal battles continue to unfold.
