The concept of the “everlasting man” is gaining attention as advancements in transhuman technology raise questions about the future of humanity. Proponents believe that merging humans with robotics and artificial intelligence might lead to eternal life. While some dismiss this idea as far-fetched, others hold a deep faith in its potential. Among those who have pondered the essence of humanity is the renowned writer and thinker, Gilbert Keith (G.K.) Chesterton.
This December marks the centenary of the publication of Chesterton’s influential work, The Everlasting Man. Celebrated for his wit and insight, Chesterton made significant contributions to literature, writing eighty books, hundreds of essays, and being nominated for the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1935. His exploration of humanity’s essence and purpose continues to resonate, particularly during the Christmas season, when many reflect on the significance of the incarnation of Jesus Christ.
A pivotal figure influenced by Chesterton was C.S. Lewis, a scholar at Oxford and Cambridge. Lewis credits Chesterton’s work with shaping his understanding of Christianity. He remarked, “I read Chesterton’s The Everlasting Man and for the first time saw the whole Christian outline of history set out in a form that seemed to me to make sense.” This clarity played a crucial role in Lewis’s eventual conversion to Christianity.
Chesterton’s book serves as a counterpoint to H.G. Wells’s atheistic interpretation of history in The Outline of History, published in 1923. Wells proposed a view of human evolution devoid of divine influence, suggesting that social progress hinges entirely on humanity’s scientific and technological advancements. Chesterton, however, argued that if Jesus Christ is indeed the “everlasting man,” history itself has been profoundly altered.
In his work, Chesterton emphasizes that rather than a linear progression, history reflects a significant interruption brought by the life and teachings of Christ. He stated, “Rather have I deliberately dwelt on that incredible interruption as a blow that broke the very backbone of history.” This perspective invites readers to consider the implications of Christianity’s endurance over nearly two millennia, which Chesterton believed could not be explained by mere human error or ecstasy.
The ongoing debate between the worldviews of Chesterton and Wells remains relevant. Their contrasting ideas echo in contemporary discussions surrounding belief systems and societal values. The current cultural landscape in the West reflects a similar polarization, reminiscent of the early twentieth-century discourse between these two intellectual giants.
Chesterton’s insights into the nature of faith and existence offer a powerful alternative to the reliance on technology for achieving eternal life. His assertion that true everlasting life is not something humanity can engineer resonates with many who seek deeper meaning beyond technological advances.
In closing, as the holiday season approaches, the exploration of these profound ideas invites reflection on the essence of humanity and the potential for true everlasting life. Chesterton’s vision, articulated a century ago, continues to challenge contemporary thought and encourages a return to the fundamental questions of existence.
Merry Christmas to all as we consider the enduring significance of these discussions. Ed Yager is a Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Western Kentucky University and the author of Ronald Reagan’s Journey: Democrat to Republican (Rowman & Littlefield, 2006) and the forthcoming The Separate Journeys of Karl Marx and C.S. Lewis.
