Concerns are mounting in Hawaii over the potential implications of a military land lease, as local leaders emphasize the need to adhere to environmental laws. In a recent commentary, former state official Gary Hooser called on Governor Josh Green to reconsider his support for the ongoing negotiations with the Army regarding public lands at Pohakuloa.
In an article published by the Honolulu Star-Advertiser, both Governor Green and Army Secretary Dan Driscoll were reported discussing their commitment to protecting the natural environment and following legal protocols. Despite these assertions, Hooser highlighted the Army’s attempts to transfer public lands and conduct military activities, including bombings, without fully complying with state regulations.
The Hawaii Board of Land and Natural Resources has already rejected the Army’s environmental impact statement (EIS), citing significant deficiencies. This rejection underscores a critical point: Hawaii law mandates that public land transfers cannot proceed without an acceptable EIS. Furthermore, the Hawaii Constitution states that all public natural resources are held in trust for the benefit of the people, emphasizing the state’s duty to conserve its natural beauty for both current and future generations.
Hooser expressed concern that Governor Green may be prioritizing military interests over his responsibilities to the people of Hawaii. He urged the governor to pause negotiations and reflect on the state’s public trust obligations.
As discussions continue, the situation at Pohakuloa remains a focal point for environmental advocates and local residents who are concerned about the long-term impact of military activities on Hawaii’s unique ecosystems. The outcome of these negotiations could set a significant precedent for how public lands are managed and protected in the future.
In light of these developments, community members are encouraged to engage in the conversation. The Honolulu Star-Advertiser welcomes public input, allowing individuals to submit letters to the editor on this pressing issue.
The situation illustrates the ongoing tension between military needs and environmental stewardship—a complex challenge that requires careful consideration from all stakeholders involved.
