Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ attorneys have filed a detailed 380-page memorandum urging a New York judge to impose a lenient sentence of no more than 14 months following his conviction for interstate transportation of consenting adults for prostitution. The filing, submitted on September 23, 2025, emphasizes the challenges Combs has faced during his incarceration and advocates for his return to his family.
The defense contends that a sentence of 14 months would effectively equate to time already served, considering Combs has been in custody since his arrest over a year ago. They maintain that the sentencing decision should solely reflect the charges for which Combs was convicted, dismissing the notion of imposing a harsher penalty based on unproven allegations of sex trafficking or coercion.
In their argument, the attorneys noted that Combs was acquitted of more serious charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering, which have drawn significant media attention. They argue that any attempt to factor these allegations into the sentencing would constitute a violation of justice.
Defense Highlights Character and Personal Losses
The defense’s memorandum is not just a legal argument but a comprehensive plea for leniency, including letters from family, friends, and business associates who speak to Combs’s character. These personal testimonials aim to provide the judge with insight into Combs’ positive contributions to society and his desire to reunite with his family.
Critically, the defense challenges the anticipated recommendations from prosecutors and the Probation Department, which are likely to suggest a more severe sentence, potentially around five years. They label these recommendations as “draconian,” likening the government’s approach to the character of the Queen of Hearts from Alice in Wonderland, suggesting a lack of perspective on the case.
The legal team underscores that Combs did not profit from the alleged prostitution activities. They assert that the individuals involved, including Cassie Ventura, who testified under a pseudonym, were consenting adults who voluntarily engaged in sexual activities. This characterization directly contradicts the media’s portrayal of the case, which has often emphasized elements of coercion and force.
Personal Struggles and Impact of Conviction
Combs’ attorneys also paint a picture of his personal struggles, detailing significant losses he has endured, including the deaths of his father, his close friend Christopher Wallace (Notorious B.I.G.), and the mother of his children, Kim Porter. They argue that these tragic events, coupled with issues related to substance abuse, anger, and anxiety, should be taken into account during sentencing. They contend that Combs addressed these challenges only after his incarceration, further justifying a lenient sentence.
The filing contrasts the defense’s portrayal of Combs as a caring family man and a contributing member of society with the prosecution’s depiction of him as a violent and controlling figure. By emphasizing the personal and professional impact of his conviction, the defense seeks to demonstrate that Combs has already faced significant consequences.
In summary, Combs’ legal team is advocating for a 14-month sentence that aligns more closely with the nature of his conviction, while criticizing the prosecution’s approach as excessively punitive. The case highlights the complexities of the legal system, particularly in high-profile scenarios where public perception can heavily influence judicial outcomes.
