The director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Jay Bhattacharya, has faced criticism from health experts for his recent statements regarding health disparities. Despite asserting that the NIH supports the health and well-being of minority groups, the agency has terminated several grants that fund research in this critical area. Experts argue that this action contradicts Bhattacharya’s claims.
In a report published on August 1, 2025, by STAT News, Bhattacharya, a former researcher on racial health disparities, expressed that while race may be considered in health studies under certain circumstances, he views the study of structural racism as “ideological” and “unscientific.” His comments come in the wake of the NIH’s decision to cancel funding for research examining the effects of structural racism on diseases like kidney failure and cancer.
Critics Highlight Ongoing Disparities
Experts in public health have voiced concerns about Bhattacharya’s stance. Mary Bassett, the François-Xavier Bagnoud Professor of the Practice of Health and Human Rights at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, criticized his remarks, stating, “Dr. Bhattacharya describes himself as an epidemiologist. It’s a core part of our field that we study groups with higher rates of disease.” She emphasized the persistent health inequities faced by Black Americans, noting that “there hasn’t been a single year since Colonial America that the population of Black America hasn’t died younger and died sicker than white America.”
Adding to this discourse, Nancy Krieger, a professor of social epidemiology at Harvard Chan School, pointed out that health disparities can be analyzed through scientific methods. “These are testable ideas,” she remarked. “You actually have to come up with specific hypotheses about how health care systems are structured in ways that do or don’t help the health outcomes.”
Implications for Future Research
The NIH’s reduction of funding for studies on health disparities is raising questions about the future of research in this vital area. As the NIH sets the agenda for health research in the United States, many fear that a lack of focus on structural racism may hinder progress towards addressing the inequities that persist in the healthcare system.
The controversy surrounding Bhattacharya’s comments highlights a broader debate within the health community about the role of structural factors in health outcomes. As discussions continue, the implications for policy and funding in health research are significant, prompting calls for a reassessment of priorities at the NIH.
The ongoing dialogue underscores the necessity of examining how various social determinants affect health outcomes and the importance of maintaining funding for research that seeks to uncover and address these disparities. As the conversation evolves, the need for a comprehensive understanding of health inequities remains crucial for shaping effective health policies in the future.
