The network MS NOW has faced backlash after altering a portrait of the late nurse and activist, Alex Pretti, to present a more traditionally masculine image. The modified photo debuted during a segment on Nicolle Wallace’s show, where Wallace discussed the implications of President Donald Trump’s rhetoric regarding public perception and trust in the media. Critics quickly condemned the network for what they perceive as deceptive practices.
During the broadcast, Wallace remarked, “Donald Trump and his administration are demanding once again that you do not believe your eyes and ears.” This statement came as the modified image of Pretti, now portrayed with enhanced features, was shown to viewers. The reaction on social media was immediate, with many users expressing their discontent over the alteration, suggesting it was an attempt to reshape Pretti’s image to fit a specific narrative.
Reactions and Criticism
Commenters on various platforms criticized MS NOW for transforming Pretti’s appearance, suggesting that the changes were made to make him more appealing to viewers. Some noted that the original portrayal of Pretti, who was a nurse, was altered significantly, implying he had undergone a “full-blown nose job and tan.” Critics pointed out that this decision seemed to be motivated by a desire to cater to a specific audience demographic.
One commenter remarked, “They didn’t want him to look like a skinny pale vegan nut,” highlighting perceptions that the network may have aimed to distance itself from Pretti’s original image. The discussion escalated with comparisons to past instances of media manipulation, where images were altered to fit a narrative or expectation.
The outrage continued to build as more users shared their thoughts on the manipulation of Pretti’s portrait. Some suggested that such actions were indicative of broader issues within media representation and authenticity.
Historical Context and Media Manipulation
This incident is not the first time a cable news network has faced allegations of altering images for propaganda purposes. Social media users referenced previous instances where photos of public figures were modified, further fueling the conversation about media integrity. One user pointed to a well-known alteration involving comedian Joe Rogan, describing it as an example of how far networks might go to influence public perception.
The controversy surrounding the altered image of Pretti raises questions about the ethics of media representation. As audiences increasingly scrutinize the authenticity of visuals presented by news outlets, the implications of such alterations could have lasting effects on public trust.
As the discussion unfolds, it remains to be seen how MS NOW will address the backlash and whether this incident will prompt a broader examination of media practices in the digital age.
