The University of Oklahoma has dismissed a graduate teaching assistant, Mel Curth, from her teaching duties following a controversy over her grading of a student’s essay on gender roles. The university initially placed Curth on administrative leave but announced on December 24, 2023, that she would no longer serve as an instructor.
University officials stated that the decision stemmed from Curth’s “arbitrary” grading of a paper submitted by undergraduate student Samantha Fulnecky. The university emphasized its commitment to academic freedom for faculty while also ensuring that students receive fair evaluations free from inappropriate standards. In a formal statement, the university noted its dedication to teaching students critical thinking rather than imposing specific beliefs.
Fulnecky’s essay sparked the dispute when she included her personal religious views, stating, “My prayer for the world and specifically for American society and youth, is that they would not believe the lies being spread from Satan that make them believe they are better off as another gender than what God made them.” Curth claimed she failed the essay because it did not adhere to the assignment’s requirements, was self-contradictory, and relied heavily on personal ideology instead of empirical evidence.
When Fulnecky sought a grade change, Curth responded with an analogy, stating that if a student argued the Earth was flat in a geology class, they would need to provide substantial evidence rather than rely on personal belief. Fulnecky subsequently appealed her grade, but the university confirmed that the essay would not contribute to her final grade.
In response to her dismissal, Curth’s attorney, Brittany M. Stewart, indicated that they are considering all legal options, including an appeal. Fulnecky has also filed a complaint alleging religious discrimination, asserting that her beliefs and freedom of speech were unfairly targeted. She described the situation as “absurd” and emphasized her right to express her religious views.
The controversy has attracted attention from various groups, including Turning Point USA, an organization established by conservative activist Charlie Kirk. The situation has led to student protests and discussions around academic freedom and the political climate in education. Faculty rights advocates, such as Todd Wolfson, president of the American Association of University Professors, criticized the university’s actions, suggesting they represent an effort to politicize and surveil academic instruction, which could undermine the integrity of higher education.
As this case continues to unfold, it raises significant questions about the balance between academic standards, freedom of expression, and the role of personal beliefs in educational settings.
